🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."